Is great for a one-off This is an ideal mass manufacturing approach, but high setup costs mean that you can't use it for anything less than thousands of parts. Outsourcing castings to a foundry can mean weeks-long delays in the development cycle. Most foundries won't do short run production as it's not cost-effective. Automatically generate parts from your CAD file. Pushbutton hands-free metal manufacturing.
From design to multiple parts in a single day. Combines the freedoms of 3D printing. Part production speed and economy of metal casting. Zero switching pain to change metals. Fits into your current development workflow — no special design requirements. Parts are fully dense - functionally equivalent physical properties as metal casting.
Post processing comparable to die casting. Josh is leading the development of our printing technology. He has a wealth of experience in robotics and submersibles and has been a key part of the success of our prototype machine.
RuiFeng is a talented industrial designer whose masters in 3d Printed products and focus on user experience has been ideal for his role in prototyping and design for manufacture. Robby is leading the development of the electronics. He has plenty of experience with custom-built antennas and automation. He played an integral part of the success of our prototype machine.
Henry W. Published Online: December 16, Abstract Sand casting offers weight and cost advantages that make it an optimal manufacturing process choice for many situations. Volume Subject Area:. You do not currently have access to this content. Sign In or Register for Account. Sign in via your Institution. Learn about subscription and purchase options. Product added to cart. View Metrics.
Email alerts Proceedings Paper Activity Alert. Latest Conference Proceedings Alert. Micro Nano-Manuf September, Privacy policy. This document describes how drivers can implement a custom Miracast stack in Windows 8. As of Windows 10, the OS ships with a built-in Miracast stack that can work on any GPU and it is no longer recommended that drivers implement a custom Miracast stack.
This documentation is therefore deprecated and Microsoft might remove support for custom Miracast stacks in a future version of Windows. This capability was introduced in Windows 8. For more information on the requirements of drivers and hardware to support Miracast displays, refer to the Building best-in-class Wireless Projection solutions with Windows 10 guide and the relevant WHLK documentation at Device.
The following pages describe how Windows 8. The reference pages in this section describe wireless display Miracast user-mode functions that the operating system implements. Only Miracast user-mode drivers can call these functions. The reference pages in this section describe wireless display Miracast functions that a Miracast user-mode driver must implement. This type of driver runs in a standalone DLL. All user-mode structures and enumerations that are used with Miracast display device driver interfaces DDIs.
These additional user-mode structures and enumerations support Miracast displays and are new or updated for Windows 8. The Miracast display callback interface contains functions that are implemented by the Microsoft DirectX graphics kernel subsystem to support wireless Miracast displays. This interface is supported starting in Windows 8. This section contains kernel-mode functions that are implemented by display miniport drivers that support wireless Miracast displays.
These additional kernel-mode structures and enumerations support Miracast displays and are new or updated for Windows 8.
0コメント